The man who was almost a man by Richard Wright Essay

The man who was almost a man by Richard Wright - Essay Example Seeing that he was being controlled in almost every sphere of his life, David decides to establish his own identity. Due to the increasing resentful of his powerlessness, Dave thinks that moving out and owning a gun would instantaneously make him a man by using the gun. He has a higher likelihood of shooting. â€Å"Dammit, hed done it! He fired again. Blooooom! He smiled. Blooooom! Blooooom! Click, click. There! It was empty†. Due to his inability to control himself, he decided to shoot Jenny (horse) just to prove to himself his not afraid. He says, "Lissen here, Jenny! When Ah pull this ol trigger, Ah don wan yuh t run n acka fool now!† and he run away. Additionally, his running away was wrong since he needed to pay for the mule that he killed which belonged to Mr. Hawkins. Mr Hawkins says, â€Å"Whut yuh pay fer it?" "Two dollahs." The other argument is that is it wrong for him to run away because he could be provoked and shoot people in the train considering that his gun was loaded, â€Å"Got a long strip of old flannel from a trunk, wrapped the gun in it, and tied it to his naked thigh while it was still loaded.† Since Dave was so engrossed in proving himself to be a man, wherever he runs to he will cause much more harm with the gun due to his attempts of trying to establish himself as a man â€Å"He felt his pocket; the gun was still there†¦ stretching away, away to somewhere, somewhere where he could be a man.† Therefore, is it important for people to know who they are in the world? This is the question Dave should have asked himself before making that decision of purchasing a gun. One needs to recognize himself to prevent serious problems from occurring. That is why Dave was not right by escaping with the train to move out of his

DuPont divests Conoco Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

DuPont divests Conoco - Case Study Example The divestiture should be made from a financial perspective and not arbitrarily in order to create more vaule for the firm by breaking the firm into more pieces. Considerations must be made to analyze what effect a carve-out could have on the company? What effect could a spin-off have on the company? What effect could an asset sale have on the company? All these options must be considered in relation to market, firm return and net return. The main benefit of divestiture is the production of wealth for the parent company. Historically the divestiture of a company has caused a positive Net Present Value (NPV) based on the size of the company based on â€Å"Takeovers, Restructuring and Corporate Governance†. â€Å"Alchian and Demsetz (1972) and Jensen and Meckling (1976) suggest one reason why corporate divestitures might create wealth. If the divestitures improve managerial incentives or better enable shareholders to monitor managerial performance, then the separation of a corporation into different pieces can improve the efficiency of operations and thereby increase the combined value of the assets.†